The Post ‘Sickularism’ Age is finally here

Today Modi rocked Mumbai. Being a Mumbaikar I felt the energy of Bandra Kurla Complex through the airwaves in far away cold Gurgaon. I felt the gap in Left of Centre Politics in India as well. The syntax can be termed as Leadership which is not aloof. The High Command Culture of Lutyens Delhi was breached earlier this month by a civil society activist Kejriwal. Kejriwal’s politics is very much left of centre especially its economic populism. But there is a difference- Kejriwal’s vocabulary consists of a connect with the urban poor. He won the trophy constituency of New Delhi beating Sheila Aunty by a large margin.  The Aam Admi Party is scripting a new narrative for urban metropolitan politics in this country. Accountability, Inclusive Governance, Proactive Leadership are adjective-verbs that are currently appropriated by the Right in India and now by the Aam Admi Party. The ethos of a strong technocratic Developmental State is the edifice of Modi’s Politics. Raman Singh’s Chhattisgarh uses Welfare very effectively too. The core plank of Congress’s Politics is Welfare centric. I am a supporter of Entitlement Legislations as it is often the last resort of the extreme poor.  But Welfare needs a robust infrastructure to deliver value to the costumers. We live in the era of a Client-State Relationship. The legislations have to deliver on the ground. Ofcourse the lessons of governance are iterative, they take time for the results to emerge on the central dashboard of the media monitors.  The loss in Rajasthan has shown that Welfare is not a magic bullet. Strong Leadership matters in the atmosphere of policy paralysis.

Congress’s other political Killer App is secularism. Unfortunately, this is a pejorative word with a negative connotation. This means minority-ism and vote bank politics. The introduction of the communal violence bill is not the reform legislation that’s top priority anyways. The Lok Pal Act is a victory for the civil society and not for Rahul ji as it was a reactive measure. 

Secularism isn’t panacea. The Politics of Pluralism has a wider appeal. Arun Shourie should take a workshop for the friends from the Left. Regional Leaders are strong leaders. A Nitish and a Jayalalitha ji are perceived as leaders who have a mass base unlike a Scindia.

The Liberal Left has to realise that Developmentalism and Strong Leadership is the need of the hour rather  rhetoric on communalism. Modi and Kejriwal are metaphors for clean and development based politics. The Congress needs more Jairam and Pilot than Gehlot and Jogi.

A Pluralism+Development+StrongLeadership approach. Is it that difficult Rahulji?

Why Brand Modi needs to be Team Modi in order to win?

Narendra Bhai Modi has already started his campaign towards 7, RCR. He has lead Gujarat with a confidence rarely seen on the Indian political canvas. Excellent Orator, a macho image and a development czar almost in the mold of the initial years of Lee Kuan Yew, all make him a hit ticket entity for the urban youth. The recent fracas with the Wharton School withdrawing an invite, has transformed him into a sociological totem of nationalist prestige. Whenever we watch Narendra Modi, we feel the strong leadership we have missed with our current technocratic Prime Minister. He seems connected with the pulse of the nation, unlike a NGO leadership style-esque of Team Rahul. May be the National Advisory Council bug seems to have inflicted the mainstream congress too. ‘Five Star Activists’ do not win elections. Kejriwal is understanding the difference only too well.

But unfortunately for Modi Bhai, India is a parliamentary democracy unlike the United States where he is denied a visa. APCO Worldwide PR Strategy is effective but he needs more regional leaders and grassroots Sangh Parivar cadre to spread the word in Rural India. Modi needs to be a consensus man, get more allies on board apart from the Akalis and the Sena twins. Selvi Jaya Madam is sitting on the fence, characteristic of the national game plan of Dravidian parties. Nitish is blowing his own developmental trumpet with a trip to Pakistan to spruce up his minority credentials. Indian Politics is all about tokenism. That is the problem with it.

Modi needs a Shivraj Singh Chauhan and a Manohar Parrikar in his team to win comprehensively. A Rahul has a Diggi Raja and Jairam with a ‘PC’ as his henchmen. A leader from the South would help Modi.

Electoral Politics in Coalition Politics is a team sport. It is time that a ‘Team Modi’ complements the brand. Even Atal ji had a LK Advani and Jawant Singh to supplement his leadership. History holds important pointers. 

The Necessity of a Hindu Right: A Liberal Pragmatist’s petition

India has a rich cultural and historical heritage, and this plank is often a refuge for both the scandalous and the sacred. The Hindu Right appropriates the ‘symbols’ of our Hindu heritage to form the canvas for its political picture. It is not a lone example in the world. Embedding religious symbols in the political narrative has been seen to be used often to heckle emotions in the political discourse. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has used the idea of a Political Islam since its inception in 1928 to further its ideology of reinstating the Caliphate. This had ceased to exist with the fall of the Ottoman Empire as the First World War came to an end. The Muslim Brotherhood finally came to power in 2012 in a democratic election after the Arab Spring currents swept the Middle East.

One of the original proponents of a religious-ethnicity based political franchises is the the United Malay’s National Organization (UMNO). UMNO managed to create a non alcoholic mocktail (pun intended) of race and religion to fuel its political ambitions since ‘Merdeka Day’ on 30th May 1957. This was partly a reaction to the racial riots of 1969, which deepened the roots of the biased Bumiputera policy. This is still being pursued at the cost of alienating  an overwhelming majority of non Malay ethnicities from the economic mainstream, apart from a few Nanyang Chinese Business Families.  Moving barat or westwards in Bahasa Melayu, our discussion steers back to the Indian context, the focus of this post.  .

The Author of this article believes in the Idea of an Inclusive and Plural India. But the ‘Secular Fundamentalism’ of Ataturk’s Turkey or Manishanker Aiyer’s 2004 ideological diatribe ‘The Confessions of a Secular Fundamentalist’ is certainly playing with fire. It may be scripture for staunch secularists, but it is flawed in its fundamental argument, as it calls for the complete censure of the majority (religious or ethnic) and its fundamental concerns in the poitical discourse of the nation, which leads to dangerous consequences. The genesis of success of the political right is more serendipitous than calculated as my case is expatiated in the following paragraph. History is witness to momentous events and economic depressions that have often been the seed germinating   the political right, propelling them into the corridors of power. A Tahrir Square was catalytic for the Brotherhood in Cairo, as was the Ram Janmabhoomi Movement in the 1980’s, both of which transformed a fringe force to a potent political movement with a majoritarian domestic view.  

 

The presence of a right wing dispensation also brings in many positives. The deeply entrenched sense of a cultural history drives the movement to work towards a ‘national’ cause, often reflected in times of cross-territorial conflict. This understanding of a belonging to a culture is often amiss in the left leaning liberal, for whom a foreigner Marx is dearer and more conceptually correct than a nationalist icon such as Swami Vivekananda. His call for the resurrection of the ‘Hindu Identity’ as a reformer and nationalist made him  one of the earliest Hindu icons  who inspired millions of ‘suppressed’, ‘culturally wounded’ Indians to look beyond drudgery and self pity, and reclaim their glorious identity of the ancient past.  A recent trip to Vadodara was quite revealing, with banners of Swamiji at every corner, creating a sense of pride in the Hindus, who saw in the appropriation of an Icon attempts to evoke pride in our culture. I also passed through Naroda Patiya on my way to Amdavad Airport, where the one of the most gruesome episodes of the 2002 violence occurred. A decade has passed, and the recent Gujarat mandate clearly showed that the populace of a State preferred the Hindu Right. That this choice has remained constant for most part of the past quarter of a century is something which our media fails to grasp. Justice and Reconciliation takes time, as the South African episode has shown, and we cannot afford to mortgage our future for the sake of our past.

It is within this socio-cultural context that the right wing political groupings often are able to push forward economic reforms. For them, it fits perfectly into the picture of reclaiming the glory of the ancient past of the nation, under the auspices of the ‘spiritual and cultural’ guidance of the times of yore. A perfect example of this has been the tenure of NDA between 1998 and 2004. The NDA regime had a terrific track record on Infrastructure, whether bit is the Golden Quadrilateral Project or opening up the Telecom Sector, these are the foundational elements of our economic growth.  The disinvestment agenda under the NDA regime was aggressive and economy was certainly on a growth trajectory during Atalji’s era. On the National Security agenda, any border deal which is sealed by a Right Wing dispensation will be far more acceptable by the majority community in opposition to a sell-out to the enemy as a hypothetical Bangladesh Nationalist Party Government deal with the Indian Government on the Teesta river sharing accord, albeit highly unlikely.

 The Hindu Right has been absent from the seat of power at the Federal level since a decade, although it has been in control of major states such as Madhya Pradesh , Chattisgarh and Karnataka with relative success. Governance has been a trump card in the arsenal of the Right. Congress’s trump card of an Inclusive governance platform has fallen much short of the initial euphoria of its overvelming mandate in 2009. The dynastic politics of the Congress does not buy any favors from the electorate any more given the demographic transitions in the nation. The constellation of leadership alternatives offered by the BJP and the NDA is a strength that can be leveraged thirteen months from now.

Thus, secularism as an ideology is spent force as far as the 2014 polls or even earlier is concerned, as it is equated with crony capitalism, corruption and casteism.  Liberalism as a political project has to grow muscles of economic rationale to attract a rapidly urbanizing electorate. And conversely The Hindu Right has to tone down the volume of marginalization of the religious minorities. The Modi-esque Hindutva + Development model for the nation, perhaps?

Special Thanks for inputs to Mr. Rohit Pathania

Brand NaMo: A Metaphor for Development Authoritarianism

Narendra Modi is a good student of political science as he gauges social architecture both soft and hard to rule Gujarat. He has built a brand very attractive to the urbane middle class. Well, about 80% of the urban seats in the recent third term win is a testament to the same. This article is certainly not a summary of recent reads available in the conventional media and being such as polarizing figure in the Indian Political Landscape, he is very well researched by writers.  This post touches upon the governance model and its political symbolism as a flagpost for democracy in this country.

I am not a Modi Fan, quite was quite anti his genre of politics actually as i am for a plural, secular and inclusive idea of India. A man who presided during the 2002 riots and supposedly did not discharge his Raj Dharma, is not a man who is to be a leading opposition party’s candidate for Prime Minister. He has been an international recluse with the Americans refusing him a visa. Although the Brits being born businessmen as Gujaratis have warmed up to him.

The research question that pops up in my psyche is : What makes NaMo such a hit with the urbane middle class inspite of all the negative rhetoric blemishing his resume?

Firstly, He is Macho. Aggressive, Powerful Orator with a persona of being a man of action helps when contrasting him with Dr. Singh and Rahul ji.  He is Tech Savvy; uses Twitter, has a laptop and connects well with the aspirations of the right side of the populace representing the demographic dividend. He connects well with the Industry and realises that development only can create jobs. The Vibrant Gujarat Summit and its success speaks  volumes as an advertorial for the State. He has brought in Technocrats to oversee projects in his administration. Although seven of his ministers lost in this election, Brand Modi remains popular as ever. A Development oriented Politician with a mass base. A rare sight in our public discourse where caste and creed define electoral fortunes. And in this election, the Sangh supported the opposition and he still won with an overwhelming mandate.

His government still has to improve human development indicators in the socially conservative state. Modi reminds me of the South Korean Military Leader, the father of the current president who drove Korea to prosperity or an Pinochet who ruled with an iron fist while his nation did economically very well. A Singapore with a Lee Kuan Yew ran a single party democracy while shepherding his country from ‘Third World to The First’. Deng Xiopeng was a Communist Ruler who advocated economic liberalization.

Developmental transition comes with a political/social cost. The minorities in Gujarat are paying for that in a way with their space reducing every day. In Singapore, communities were moved from Kampungs or villages to shoe box apartments in State built housing estates. Their old way of life was lost forever. Singapore has done an amazing job. I salute LKY and the PAP leadership on their meritocratic governance.

Modi’s win is a watershed in a way that people will tolerate particular variety of authoritarianism if the job is delivered. The Late Shiv Sena Chief Balasaheb called it the ‘ThokShahi’ or Dictatorship as a form of rule needed in India. No wonder he was a fan of Hitler.

The politics of development is gaining currency. India needs it badly. Secular or not.